"Group of Twenty", created in 1999 in "sleep" format, the finance minister and central bank, is an extended version of the "Group of Ten". This is - a pool of founders and board members of the Basel Bank for International Settlements. With the help of "independent from the government" CB he subdues the financial policy of the Member States of the Basel club interests of the global oligarchy. And he does it in full compliance with the covenant of the founder of the Rothschild dynasty Meier Amschel, "Give me to print money, and I do not care who sits in the government!". Private investment in infrastructure designed for its subordination of states to private investors, which is closely related to global oligarchic business, and thereby reducing the role of the state, until the complete removal of life support systems from under national control in the private sector. And turning them into an instrument of external control by a well-known principle "would not take (listen) - turn off the gas!". "Many Member States (" twenty ") ... use of public-private partnerships to improve the efficiency of investments in their countries and to reduce the burden of direct financing, the Lodge at the State ..." - illustrate the correctness of the above copyright creators Brisbane withdrawal plan. Here is this "captivating with its novelty and originality" idea in the documents of the summit of Brisbane. "... Further measures to reduce barriers to foreign direct investment, the channeling of funds (foreign and private investors - auth.) On social infrastructure and improvement (in favor of private traders and foreign TNCs - auth.) Is carried out by the public sector investment management ... We recognize that competition may prevent unnecessary regulation that creates barriers to entry in the industry (!) or limits the scope for competition between companies ... Countering protectionism remains one of the basic obligations of the "Group of Twenty" - we read in the Brisbane plan ... - Effective and well functioning markets are of fundamental value as catalyst (!) private sector investments (!). We appeal to the WTO, the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development - Ed.), UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development - auth.) To continue to monitor measures to restrict trade and investment in the "Group of Twenty" ... and provide us a report on the them every six months ... "(ie," knock "in created in Brisbane" central headquarters ", which is lower on the country and the government is not willing to indulge in his" garden "globally-oligarchic monopoly).
For those to whom this is not enough to ensure that the ultimate goals of the global unification and sovereignty of states of deprivation, these goals are further explained in the following passage, speaking of the same outcome. "The products are now" Made in the World "(! - Hence, the GDP too - Ed.), And imports significantly affects the ability to export competitiveness. In conditions when the supply chain work through markets of many countries at once, domestic regulation affects the company's decision to invest in a particular country, trade, create jobs. "
So, establishes a connection between a three out of five mentioned areas in which decisions "twenty" sovereign states impose proverbial "single" (oligarchic) "approach." Investment and free, not limited protectionism, TRADE need to manage global institutions global oligarchy only to under the guise of "economic growth" and "new jobs", the plant transnational monopoly on domestic markets. And under the guise of competition as to promote private and foreign investment (oligarchic) sector and push and take control of the entire economy as a whole, subordinating not only large but also small and medium businesses. And thus suppressing all competition, to introduce a continuous, global monopoly, transforming the state into "reserve Aboriginal" and their wealth - the ownership of the global oligarchy. "The normalization of monetary policy in some advanced economies will reflect a strong economic growth and would be a positive sign for the global economy ... Our Central Bank pledged to continue the policy of carefully researched and well-defined monetary policy ..." - read in Brisbane Action Plan .
In whose interest? Yes, all the same, oligarchic. "We ensure that such macroeconomic policies that will sustain demand, strengthen growth and will help to reduce global imbalances - is another Brisbane document - Communique leaders. - We will continue to flexibly carry out fiscal strategy, taking into account the short-term economic conditions, with (sic!) Providing access to stable trajectories ratio of debt to GDP. "
No need to be a genius, not only economic, but also an economist at all to understand what we are talking about the total and overall implementation of the rules of the IMF and World Bank, as we shall see below, and. But what is "global imbalances", which organizers Brisbane declare war? This is the equivalent of state sovereignty, where sovereignty is - there imbalances and preventing global oligarchy that recognizes the "balanced" only their own interests. Consequently, sovereignty also proposed to declare war. "Effective global unbalance remains in perspective our main priority - recorded at Brisbane Action Plan. - For global rebalancing is also important that internal imbalances were completely overcome ... We reaffirm our determination to move faster towards a market system of exchange rates .... We will refrain from competitive devaluation and will not use exchange rate targets for competitive purposes. We will resist all forms of protectionism, keeping our markets open. "Decipher. "Imbalance" - is the current state sovereignties under which any or China, for example, Russia can engage in "competitive devaluation" (
maintain its profitable automaker exchange rate), making it difficult to "openness of our (oligarchic) markets," which provides "more market system, "" Global Re-balancing "- not that other, as the destruction of" internal balance ", ie sovereignty, punching" openness "and the monopolization of markets oligarchy that now and will set exchange rates. Of course, the alleged "market" means. In this very GIZ very easily discern the features of the inverse image of "world government" as economic. But for the political "world government" in the pocket too will not come back. In September 2015 in New York City will gather next World Summit, which in accordance with the decision of the Conference on Environment and Development "Rio + 20" (2012) create a "High Level Policy Forum", which will replace the current UN Commission on Sustainable Development. Sit "GIZ government" will be the same in the Australian Sydney, that is on the far periphery of the Anglo-Saxon West. In whose interest is it to act? Naive question, though will not be superfluous to clarify specific details. "In order to strengthen the infrastructure and attract more private sector investment in developing countries - we read in Sec. 7 Communique leaders of the" Group of Twenty "- we welcome (sic!) The development of the" Global infrastructure mechanism of the World Bank ", which will complement our work. "
Who could doubt it? After all, the World Bank and the IMF have a "twenty" independent mandate and with the Basel-based Bank for International Settlements constitute the same "collective global central bank", which manages the global economy through the emission center of the world's reserve currency - the Federal Reserve System (Fed), the Bank of England and the European Central Bank (ECB). So for whose benefit an "twenty"?
No comments:
Post a Comment