In Western civilization, the sexual revolution has entered a new phase: it is not the first decade of the revolution reigns homosexual.
The other day, two central European countries - Britain and France - one after the other recognized the legality of same-sex marriages. Initially, Socialist Francois Holland, followed by the Conservative David Cameron and proclaimed the right of homosexuality a family, and then selling the relevant laws through their parliaments.
Holland said at the same time that the legalization of same-sex marriage - "this is a step forward for the society".
Step, of course, but that's just - what?
Trigger a process of legalization of "same-sex family" was the famous Cairo International UN Conference on Population and Development in 1994, which adopted the Programm of Action for the Management of the population. Principle 9 of the Program secured equality and equivalence of different types of sexual unions, including same-sex unions. The goal is clear: to reduce the number of people on the planet, reduce the birth rate.
Amazingly, responded to this appeal only to Christianize white Caucasians, already endangered, and so that by the year 2050 will not exceed 15% of the universal mass. Same-sex marriage is recognized in 13 countries: the Netherlands (2001), Belgium (2003), Spain (2005), Canada (2005), South Africa (2006), Norway (2009), Sweden (2009), Portugal (2010), Iceland (2010 ), Argentina (2010), Denmark (2012), France, Great Britain (2013).
As the selection - only the countries of the old European culture. The peoples of Asia, Africa and Latin America, whose rapid growth inspires the greatest concern to ecologists in this madness take no part obviously does not intend to.
America, everywhere in the world serving in positions of extreme liberalism, in relation to itself where circumspectly: same-sex marriages legally legitimate in only 8 of the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, but banned in 39 states. And in 24 states have laws similar to the former Article 121 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, for the fact of pursuing homosexuality. In Rhode Island, for example, it could provide from 7 to 20 years in prison.
Not all civilized countries without exception enthusiastic self-destruction. In many European countries adopted laws, by contrast, aimed at consolidating the concept of marriage as the union of a man and a woman and a ban on same-sex marriage and other same-sex unions: Lithuania, Latvia, Moldova, Ukraine, Poland, Serbia, Montenegro, Bulgaria, Belarus. Similar laws have taken Latinos: Cuba, Honduras, Paraguay, Venezuela.
Also, there are many countries in the world where more than tolerant attitude "enlightened Europe" to homosexuality is disgusting and indignation. And some still retain the death penalty for homosexual acts in the entry. These countries are Iran, Mauritania, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, United Arab Emirates, Yemen and Nigeria.
After about hanging a few teenagers in Iran, a senior Iranian politician Mohsen Yahiavi said at a meeting with British MPs that homosexuals deserve the torture and execution. He "explained that according to Islam, homosexuality and lesbianism are not allowed. He argued that homosexuality is contrary to human nature and that people should engage in reproduction. Homosexuals do not reproduce the same one. "
A serious campaign against gays is in Iraq. Since 2006, Iraq had been killed without a trial of at least 750 representatives of sexual minorities.
Society in Latin America, too, is struggling with this on his own. In the mid-1990s, "Amnesty International" has protested to the Government of Colombia in connection with the fact that a few hundred homosexuals were murdered in this country, "death squads" that is, units of anonymous "cleaners society" created by volunteers.
Intolerant of homosexuality and punishes him by the law of the State of Israel.
Lengthy sentences imposed for homosexuality in China, Vietnam, New Zealand.
What fate awaits Russia and Russian in this respect? Will we mirvolit homosexuals or try to curb their claim, without bringing the matter before the mass mob justice? The benefit or harm to promise us new European standards of sexual democracy? Should we obey them?
To do this, it would be good to understand what homosexuality is and how does it apply to be considered normal.
Understanding the normal problems prevent cluttering her myths.
Let's try to check these myths.
The first myth. Homosexuality - a variant of norm.
We assure that a certain percentage of homosexuals become that even in the womb. Moreover, not only of humans, but also certain species of animals.
We are told that Nature herself is so ordered. So it should zachem-libo yes, because nature does not make mistakes. Therefore, homosexuality is a variant of the norm. What can you object to that?
Still, Charles Darwin wrote that nature is constantly throws in the life of the country variants of the norm: that terry rose bush on the usual, the nectarine (nectarine) on a standard tree. But the same Darwin argued that nature does it not for the good of man. And this is confirmed by examples.
Take the most simple: among normal people are born periodically downs, hunchbacks, dwarfs, midgets. All are children of nature, all have a right to life.
Variant rules tell someone? You could say that. Only hardly similar conservationist norms would like to see for his child was born a dwarf, or Down.
Meanwhile, the human will create the world of nature and not as another "variants of the norm"! And theoretically, if purposefully engage selection, it would be possible to bring the whole tribe of homosexuals or dwarfs, there is a will (once a tribe of dwarfs ecu-gobo really lived on earth, but became extinct).
But that's why?
Do I need to do this?
In truth, not all of the scientific community shares the view on homosexuality loyal. So, back in 1970 in the "Journal of the American Medical Association," renowned psychiatrist Charles Socarides called homosexuality "a terrible disorder, malignant in nature, accepted the size of the epidemic."
A variety of mental disorders called homosexuality Freud, his followers, all at the school of sexology the first half of the twentieth century ..
Since 1948, homosexuality was entered in the International Code of Diseases. However, in 1991, the World Health Organization was forced to delete it from the Code under fierce pressure from the International Lesbian and Gay Association. But first, it is unlikely to so fundamentally: disease or no disease. If not, then so much the worse for homosexuals: the patient could claim to our sympathy and indulgence. Second, you can not be sick (ie, healthy), but, for various reasons, different abnormal, deviant behavior, practice, and consciously false principles.
We explain: homosexuals are all the usual system of testing, and no pathology is not seen. They, therefore, normal, healthy people. Yes, normal, in all but one. But is not that one is not enough to consider them abnormal? Third. Some scientists have recently argued that the culprit - a gene homosexuality, transmitted through the female line.
But if this is true, then we have to think of new questions: - What about the selection?
Do not think about the culling of carriers homo-gene, their sterilization, surgical or social? Finally, and most importantly: any anomaly, transmitted genetically, carries with it a threat not only to the individual but also for the species as a whole. In other words, homosexuality - the disease is not so much the person (God be with her!) As mankind, it is not a problem of a particular male prostitute, but an important problem of our demographics. This is a dangerous, harmful mutations, also contagious to others.
It is known, for example, that if 18% of the newborns - the morons, the nation begins the irreversible process of degeneration. What is the need for the native-born, the percentage of homosexuals?
The second myth. Promotion of homosexuality is not dangerous.
We are told: can not be gay, they are born. Promotes homosexuality or not - its nature still take. And who is not born a homosexual, and even the words of the example will not spoil.
Alas, this is not the case.
We are not talking about the instinct of imitation, which is known to be the strongest in monkeys and children. Life has shown: homosexual contagious. Here are the numbers that make us think. In the 1860s. it was believed that homosexuality in men is found in 2 cases in 1000, ie 0.2% (Encyclopædia Britannica Euphronios). It's only a hundred years, and the most authoritative study of American sexologist Kinsey, Masters and Johnson's record is completely different, higher, number: 2 to 4 percent. It seems to be too little.
However, according to the same Kinsey for 1953 in the USA 37% of white American men had at least one orgasm with a man. Thirty-seven percent of the more than one-third!
It is clear that we have two types of behavior. Perhaps 2-4% of 37% - genetic homosexuals. Who, then, the remaining 33-35%? Where did they come from?
And how to name those involved in homosexual without being genetically predisposed to it?
And here is the clearest, also a recent example: the history of the legalization of gay marriage in New York. June 25, 2011 the State Senate passed a law legalizing same-sex marriage. And now, just two years later, a quarter of marriages in New York City accounted for same-sex couples!
Is it not clear that this is all - gomopropagandy product, the product of purposeful conscious corruption, corruption?
We assume that the judge and punish homosexuals from birth unfair, but how to justify the other?
Can these two categories qualify for the same attitude towards them?
Meanwhile gomopropaganda in the world is downright rabid.
For example, gays and lesbians are aggressively imposed on us mythical statistics, falsifying problem. They claim now that people are born into the type of every ten cases (science denies it).
But this is not enough for them!
How to write the Masters and Johnson, "due to the fact that gay organizations are springing up like mushrooms ... in cities such as Washington DC, San Francisco and New York, there are dozens of organizations supporting homosexuality - an organization of physicians, lawyers, teachers, and parents ...
Other organizations give homosexuals all sorts of advice, from a religious council to medical care.
In many college and university campuses, students have organized gay groups to help each other. Newspapers and magazines homosexual persuasion, even religious, publish information about the homosexual subculture in America, as well as private messages to help you find sexual partners. "
In many Western countries even issued a "gay-guides." Active international legal activity is the International Lesbian and Gay Association. Not far behind in their worries about homosexuals and "Amnesty International".
Working without respite, the International Commission on Human Rights for lesbians and gay men. However, in the same England in 1990 when Margaret Thatcher was adopted by the so-called Article 28, which prohibits promote homosexuality on stage, in movies, on TV and in the press - a rare example of a legitimate resistance to the onslaught of the buggers.
In general it can be stated that the law and the Old and New World capitulated to the demands of sexual minorities.
Today we have to celebrate baiting is not gay, but rather their opponents. Gradually turning the laws of the enemies into friends, American gays and lesbians in their democracy put, we can see that on its head and church morality and tradition, and the public interest, and common sense.
Behind them have achieved their European counterparts.
However, the area of the law - is not the only arena of struggle: homosexuals are well aware that to achieve a solid victory here can only be reversed in their favor public opinion.
Therefore, the scope of ideology, and especially - the area of literature and the arts, there is a long-time strategic effort to gomopropagandy.
Developed and introduced into the consciousness of many gullible public myths about the charms and safety of homosexuality.
In different countries, under the control of, say, a "gay party" get whole areas of the spiritual life of man. In the United States the strongest homolobby in the literature, even in school lessons, for example, study the play about the problems of homosexuals. In France, the same lobby - in literature, theater and cinema. (I remember ever stopped believing courageous heroes of Jean Marais, having learned that he - the veteran community buggers.) In 1994, the second in prestige after the Prix Goncourt, France's literary prize, "Renaud", was awarded the novelist G. Le Ace for the book " How's your father "to tell about the plight of her son and dad - homosexuals. Then the "News" reported that opens in Paris, the first film festival dedicated to gays and lesbians (the forum, in which about a hundred documentaries and feature films).
In Germany homophilia engulfed the world of art galleries, supervising the development of fine art. Homosexual accent pop culture has long been global in nature. And so on. About newspapers, magazines and TV programs bearing the weight of homosexual ideas, I'm not saying their name is legion.
Many years of focused work on mastering the gay public opinion led to the fact that any action against the spread of gomoideologii immediately and severely disabled, and those who dare to raise their voice to evoke a protective instinct healthy (for now) the majority identification label homophobe. On the ensuing consequences not easy.
As an example, here is the fate of the famous pop singer Donna Summer. In 1983, she publicly announced at the concert that AIDS - God's punishment for homosexuality and refused to include in their new album song dedicated to homosexuals.
During this against her amounted to a conspiracy: as a result of long-term boycott of her career and fate were broken. Eight years later, in 1991, she had to say about his "mistake" to recognize that no one else does not condemn. But too late: the way back was not there.
It is significant both: in all states of America "Union Lesbian and Gay Anti-Defamation" has managed to organize picketing cinemas, where there was the famous movie "Basic Instinct", as depicted bisexual women out there "in the form of discrediting them for no reason."
There are other examples of similar mass actions.
The third myth. Homosexuality is harmless to society.
Is this true?
It is worth considering. Let's take a look at the story: what attitude to homosexuality, long-lived peoples, whose age is not measured by centuries, and many thousands of years?
History can be summarized as: had survived for thousands of years, preserved and strengthened the authenticity of the nation, its national beregshie and sexual monoculture.
Died the same nation, sexually "pluralistic" allows the mixing of blood and sexual outrage.
Take the most familiar to us of. In all the Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) homosexuality or sodomy, sodomy, sodomy - is regarded as a grave sin, forbidden under pain of death.
But even more interesting than the ban - the moral evaluation of this sin. "Do not lie with a male as with a woman - the Bible tells us - is an abomination before the Lord" (Leviticus, XVIII, 22).
Jews are called passive homosexuals fornicators and treated with disgust (Job 36, 14).
Homosexuality was adamant and the Talmud (a lesbian he intended caning).
It is written very clearly and understandable sodomy is an abomination, sodomites - bastards.
There is no way a person who professes Judaism, Christianity or Islam, can not look away, nor to abandon the unequivocal assessment. Otherwise, it can not be called neither Jew nor Christian nor Muslim. Accordingly, it can not consider ourselves a Christian country, where are gay marriages, that is - is going legalized abomination.
According to the most sacred book of the Jews - the Torah - have fallen into the sin of homosexuality was supposed to kill, and not somehow: stoning ("a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they may be put to death" - Leviticus).
Just as lieth with a beast, by the way.
In either the Old Testament or the New, we will not meet the representatives of the gay community.
This does not mean that they could not be in biblical times, but, as they say, fearlessly discarded: the bad grass of the field out!
In Judaism generally very strict sexual morality. Is it because Jews are alive and well for the past three and a half thousand years?
And not only Jews. All the people living long and well - all tightly controlled sphere of sexual morality and marriage, and all, of course, denied homosexuality.
Thus, the Egyptian representation before the court after the death of forty-two deities had to make a Negative Confession - each of them to assure that he had not committed any of the sins, for example, is not tortured animals or did not eat the sacrificial meat. In particular, he had to swear that he was not muzhelozhtsem (125 head of "Book of the Dead", the period of the XVIII dynasty).
If he could not give a good answer to the gods of the world beyond the grave, it was not waiting there anything good.
In sredneassiriyskih laws (the third quarter of the II millennium BC. E.) Says (§ 20): "If a man knew his equal, and his oath and the accused was caught, should know him and castrate."
Hindus sodomy entailed the most terrible of punishments - disgraceful expulsion from caste, according to the laws of Manu.
In China, where traditional filolosofiya all built on the idea of harmonious combination of male and female principles ("Yan" and Yin "), during the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911) to the Criminal Code were introduced laws against sodomy, and in Maoist China, it was seen as sexual misconduct and illegal.
It is easy to see that the Egyptians, the Indo-Aryans, the Chinese, the Jews - all ethnic groups of long-lived, champions, who managed to keep themselves longer than others. There's a lot to think about.
On the contrary, people who practiced homosexuality, lived not long, only a thousand years and a half, as the Greeks or the Romans, and their end was sad.
However, Roman law in early appointed a monetary penalty for sodomy, then under the influence of the Greek tradition of homosexuality is widespread, but since the time of the Christian emperors of them it is a harsh punishment - burned and headless.
By the way, the code of the Holy Roman Empire "Carolina", named in honor of Emperor Charles V (XVI century), also kept saying gays to be burned at the stake.
Then, Europe still knew what was what.
It is impossible to mention the homosexuals, not to mention the dangers of AIDS. Among infetsirovannyh buggers are powerful part. In Switzerland, for example, the part - 35%. This risk was due to the Decree of the Minister of Health of Russia 2001 "On approval of the medical examination of donor blood and its components," actually reproduces the wording of the previous similar document "Instructions for the medical examination of donors of blood, plasma, red blood cells," 1998 In accordance with the order , persons "belonging to risk groups (homosexuals, drug addicts, prostitutes)," can not be a blood donor, and (or) its components.
Of course, these measures are necessary and useful, but obviously not enough.
The fourth myth. Homosexuality is harmless to morality.
Moral of the world rests on a religious basis. All the major religions of the world, as we have seen, a negative attitude toward homosexuality. In addition to Satanism, naturally. But it's not just the fact that homosexuals violate religious taboos. As acknowledged by the buggers, sadomasochism has always been an important and prominent part of the gay culture.
It is no accident in the works of the Marquis de Sade homosexuality - attribute masters perversity, their indispensable property.
Anal sex at the Marquis - ruthless, facing both genders, is a tool of oppression, punishment, torture, etc., it is - a clear manifestation of aggression.
Not surprisingly, sodomy - a frequent occurrence where the particular importance are the relations of domination and subordination: the army, in prison, in a monkey nursery.
It is no coincidence as sodomy is often manifested in acts of rape. So those who voted for the one-handed freedom of homosexual, and another - for the fight against pedophilia and sadism, coming in, to say the least, disingenuous.
Meanwhile, homosexuals often tend to a false sense of superiority. "I would advise homosexuals feel aristocrats feel people elected, cream of society" - advises actor Roman Viktyuk.
Generated by an inferiority complex thought about some homosexuals superiority over us like a red thread through shows through their statements and speeches.
How exactly Masters and Johnson noted: "Many homosexuals tend to finally" come out of the closet "to publicly demonstrate pride in their sexual orientation."
Naturally, our world, the world of the healthy majority, they are not satisfied, of course, they would like to change, to create a new world to your taste, in his own image and likeness. And often speak about it directly.
"Our society - heterosexual. A child is brought up from childhood heterosexual, he imposed heterosexual ideas ... The imposition of these stereotypes - monstrous "- do not hesitate to write a gay newspaper" Subject "in an editorial.
Absolutely right sociologist A. GAFAROV: "All experts agree that the homosexuals are dangerous because they impose their way of life, have a wealth of experience abuse, are well aware of the psychological tricks, feel free to use his official position."
In countries which experience we cite as an example, this occurs, for example, as follows.
In the newspaper "Chicago Tribune" published a major report on the activities of the national organization of homosexuals involved in the recruitment of boys for prostitution across the country.
In Los Angeles there is a society Rene Gunona acting under the slogan: "Sex begins with 8 years, before it is too late." The purpose of this organization - to legalize sexual relations between adults and children.
The North American "Association of love to the boys' acting in support of the rights of adults to have sex with teenagers, recently accused the FBI of" witch-hunt "in view of the fact that two of its members were arrested for taking part in the kidnapping of children.
And in France, the home of courtly poetry of Alexander Dumas and Maupassant, lost annually from the families of about seven thousand boys.
The fate of many of them who have fallen into the clutches of traffickers secret "live goods", is very sad and hopeless: they are taught to drugs and forcibly converted to toys rich buggers.
Such is the experience. "Advanced."
In connection with the mentioned need to understand is dangerous not only direct propaganda of homosexuality is dangerous to any mention of it in a positive or neutral tone.
Any such action is working on the destruction of age-old taboos in the public mind, so - psychological defense against cancer cells homosexuality.
Academically objective approach is not appropriate.
And humanism - no argument when it comes not only against the interests and the protection of life and health of the human race.
According to the Penal Code Tsarist Russia for sodomy relied link to Siberia (Article 995), the Christians, moreover, were the church repent.
It was about the same as the active and passive participant, and if the act was accompanied by violence, the perpetrator appointed galleys from 10 to 12 years (Art. 996).
The very same sodomy was defined as "unnatural vice."
In the USSR, after a long period of uncertainty in 1934, a law was passed prohibiting homosexual relationships.
The last version of the law was in 1960, homosexuality (sodomy) was considered as a criminal offense.
There is evidence that from 1934 to 1980 the average annual condemned 1,000 gay men, women, studying psychiatry.
Russian gay person is not a friend, in the new Criminal Code of the Russian Federation sodomy and lesbianism are not considered as separate criminal offenses.
But as Russia was and remains the country morally do not accept homosexuality.
In particular, according to some surveys, up to 85% of the population of Russia against same-sex marriages. Not only Christians condemn homosexuality. In 2006, the Grand Mufti of the Central Spiritual Board of Muslims of Russia Talgat Tajuddin told the news agency "Interfax": "The representatives of sexual minorities can practice what they want, only at home or somewhere tucked away in the dark. If they do go out on the street, then they should just peel. All normal people will do it. "
According to him, "gay men have no rights." "They have transgressed the line - added Mr. Tajuddin. - Have homosexuality - is a crime against God.
Prophet Muhammad ordered the killing of homosexuals. " He quoted the hadith of the Prophet Muhammad, which are in addition to the Koran, establishing the foundations of the Muslim religion - Islam.
Representatives of the Russian Islamic organizations shared the position of the Interreligious Council of Russia (MCP), who spoke against the propaganda of homosexuality.
"In the MCP are spiritual centers of Russia's traditional religions, including Islam, therefore, adopted the MCP document fully reflects the position of Muslims in Russia, including on other issues relating to moral character of society," - said the deputy chairman of the Council of Muftis of Russia (SMR) Damir Gizatullin .
Given the mood Russian people in 2002, a group of deputies of the State Duma, led by Gennady Raikov, made a package of amendments to the Criminal Code, criminalizing of imprisonment for a term of one to five years for "unnatural sexual satisfaction needs men with a man (sodomy). "
One consolation is one thing. Although the Russian Family Code does not contain an explicit definition of the concept of marriage, but it clearly states: "Family relations are regulated in accordance with the principles of voluntary marital union of a man and a woman" (v. 1). And then, too, is quite explicit: "For a marriage requires a mutual voluntary consent of the men and women who marry, and of marriageable age" (v. 12).
When the news of an impending recognition of same-sex marriage in the United Kingdom and France, the Russian Foreign Ministry chief specialist on human rights Konstantin Dolgov said pointedly: "The British and French parliaments have legalized same-sex marriage. This reduces the possibility of the adoption of Russian children by citizens of these countries ... ".
This is not the first statement of official representatives of the Foreign Ministry about the sensitive issue.
In March 2012, speaking at the UN, the same Dolgov said on behalf of Russia: "Our country is opposed to the legalization of same-sex marriage and the creation of a special legal regime for selected groups, including gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transsexuals.
... We oppose the development of specific documents in the sphere of protection against discrimination against people with different sexual orientation in the framework of international organizations. Their rights are already protected by the general anti-discrimination provisions of the universal international treaties in the human rights field. "
Meanwhile, the international gay community, with support from the highest echelons of the political elite of the West, not the first time we were trying to impose their standards of sexual morality.
In November 2011, the Russian Foreign Ministry was forced to reject as "interference in internal affairs," the response of some of the world on the laws banning so-called "gomopropagandy" already existing in many regions of Russia. It was a stone in the garden of Hillary Clinton, who is very tactless expressed concern about the adoption of these laws.
"We try to protect our society from homosexual propaganda, and it is occasionally very nervous reaction from the European Union. These attempts, I believe, are beyond the scope of universally recognized values ... "- sharply and unequivocally, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
A October 2012, the Russian Foreign Ministry official said in the "Report on the Situation of Human Rights in the United States," which limits the negative remarks against gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender people, operating in the United States, violate human rights.
The situation with same-sex marriage puts a new emphasis in the story of the infamous law "Dima Yakovlev", forcing him to look at a new way. Now in the U.S., about 2 million children are being raised in same-sex pairs. Soon, according to the current tendency, a similar pattern occurs in Europe.
Can we allow our orphans were in such families?
For the Russian people the answer is clear: no. ***
In conclusion - the fact is as significant as it is startling.
It turns out that the model for the Statue of Liberty at the gates of New York City at one time served as the wife of King Isaac Singer sewing machines, bore him a daughter, the famous lesbian Vinnarettu Singer, and did not let myself never to either of his two legitimate husbands. See, that's why the statue of Liberty represents America. American freedom, which spawned the super-lesbian ...
How symbolic!
The other day, two central European countries - Britain and France - one after the other recognized the legality of same-sex marriages. Initially, Socialist Francois Holland, followed by the Conservative David Cameron and proclaimed the right of homosexuality a family, and then selling the relevant laws through their parliaments.
Holland said at the same time that the legalization of same-sex marriage - "this is a step forward for the society".
Step, of course, but that's just - what?
Trigger a process of legalization of "same-sex family" was the famous Cairo International UN Conference on Population and Development in 1994, which adopted the Programm of Action for the Management of the population. Principle 9 of the Program secured equality and equivalence of different types of sexual unions, including same-sex unions. The goal is clear: to reduce the number of people on the planet, reduce the birth rate.
Amazingly, responded to this appeal only to Christianize white Caucasians, already endangered, and so that by the year 2050 will not exceed 15% of the universal mass. Same-sex marriage is recognized in 13 countries: the Netherlands (2001), Belgium (2003), Spain (2005), Canada (2005), South Africa (2006), Norway (2009), Sweden (2009), Portugal (2010), Iceland (2010 ), Argentina (2010), Denmark (2012), France, Great Britain (2013).
As the selection - only the countries of the old European culture. The peoples of Asia, Africa and Latin America, whose rapid growth inspires the greatest concern to ecologists in this madness take no part obviously does not intend to.
America, everywhere in the world serving in positions of extreme liberalism, in relation to itself where circumspectly: same-sex marriages legally legitimate in only 8 of the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, but banned in 39 states. And in 24 states have laws similar to the former Article 121 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, for the fact of pursuing homosexuality. In Rhode Island, for example, it could provide from 7 to 20 years in prison.
Not all civilized countries without exception enthusiastic self-destruction. In many European countries adopted laws, by contrast, aimed at consolidating the concept of marriage as the union of a man and a woman and a ban on same-sex marriage and other same-sex unions: Lithuania, Latvia, Moldova, Ukraine, Poland, Serbia, Montenegro, Bulgaria, Belarus. Similar laws have taken Latinos: Cuba, Honduras, Paraguay, Venezuela.
Also, there are many countries in the world where more than tolerant attitude "enlightened Europe" to homosexuality is disgusting and indignation. And some still retain the death penalty for homosexual acts in the entry. These countries are Iran, Mauritania, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, United Arab Emirates, Yemen and Nigeria.
After about hanging a few teenagers in Iran, a senior Iranian politician Mohsen Yahiavi said at a meeting with British MPs that homosexuals deserve the torture and execution. He "explained that according to Islam, homosexuality and lesbianism are not allowed. He argued that homosexuality is contrary to human nature and that people should engage in reproduction. Homosexuals do not reproduce the same one. "
A serious campaign against gays is in Iraq. Since 2006, Iraq had been killed without a trial of at least 750 representatives of sexual minorities.
Society in Latin America, too, is struggling with this on his own. In the mid-1990s, "Amnesty International" has protested to the Government of Colombia in connection with the fact that a few hundred homosexuals were murdered in this country, "death squads" that is, units of anonymous "cleaners society" created by volunteers.
Intolerant of homosexuality and punishes him by the law of the State of Israel.
Lengthy sentences imposed for homosexuality in China, Vietnam, New Zealand.
What fate awaits Russia and Russian in this respect? Will we mirvolit homosexuals or try to curb their claim, without bringing the matter before the mass mob justice? The benefit or harm to promise us new European standards of sexual democracy? Should we obey them?
To do this, it would be good to understand what homosexuality is and how does it apply to be considered normal.
Understanding the normal problems prevent cluttering her myths.
Let's try to check these myths.
The first myth. Homosexuality - a variant of norm.
We assure that a certain percentage of homosexuals become that even in the womb. Moreover, not only of humans, but also certain species of animals.
We are told that Nature herself is so ordered. So it should zachem-libo yes, because nature does not make mistakes. Therefore, homosexuality is a variant of the norm. What can you object to that?
Still, Charles Darwin wrote that nature is constantly throws in the life of the country variants of the norm: that terry rose bush on the usual, the nectarine (nectarine) on a standard tree. But the same Darwin argued that nature does it not for the good of man. And this is confirmed by examples.
Take the most simple: among normal people are born periodically downs, hunchbacks, dwarfs, midgets. All are children of nature, all have a right to life.
Variant rules tell someone? You could say that. Only hardly similar conservationist norms would like to see for his child was born a dwarf, or Down.
Meanwhile, the human will create the world of nature and not as another "variants of the norm"! And theoretically, if purposefully engage selection, it would be possible to bring the whole tribe of homosexuals or dwarfs, there is a will (once a tribe of dwarfs ecu-gobo really lived on earth, but became extinct).
But that's why?
Do I need to do this?
In truth, not all of the scientific community shares the view on homosexuality loyal. So, back in 1970 in the "Journal of the American Medical Association," renowned psychiatrist Charles Socarides called homosexuality "a terrible disorder, malignant in nature, accepted the size of the epidemic."
A variety of mental disorders called homosexuality Freud, his followers, all at the school of sexology the first half of the twentieth century ..
Since 1948, homosexuality was entered in the International Code of Diseases. However, in 1991, the World Health Organization was forced to delete it from the Code under fierce pressure from the International Lesbian and Gay Association. But first, it is unlikely to so fundamentally: disease or no disease. If not, then so much the worse for homosexuals: the patient could claim to our sympathy and indulgence. Second, you can not be sick (ie, healthy), but, for various reasons, different abnormal, deviant behavior, practice, and consciously false principles.
We explain: homosexuals are all the usual system of testing, and no pathology is not seen. They, therefore, normal, healthy people. Yes, normal, in all but one. But is not that one is not enough to consider them abnormal? Third. Some scientists have recently argued that the culprit - a gene homosexuality, transmitted through the female line.
But if this is true, then we have to think of new questions: - What about the selection?
Do not think about the culling of carriers homo-gene, their sterilization, surgical or social? Finally, and most importantly: any anomaly, transmitted genetically, carries with it a threat not only to the individual but also for the species as a whole. In other words, homosexuality - the disease is not so much the person (God be with her!) As mankind, it is not a problem of a particular male prostitute, but an important problem of our demographics. This is a dangerous, harmful mutations, also contagious to others.
It is known, for example, that if 18% of the newborns - the morons, the nation begins the irreversible process of degeneration. What is the need for the native-born, the percentage of homosexuals?
The second myth. Promotion of homosexuality is not dangerous.
We are told: can not be gay, they are born. Promotes homosexuality or not - its nature still take. And who is not born a homosexual, and even the words of the example will not spoil.
Alas, this is not the case.
We are not talking about the instinct of imitation, which is known to be the strongest in monkeys and children. Life has shown: homosexual contagious. Here are the numbers that make us think. In the 1860s. it was believed that homosexuality in men is found in 2 cases in 1000, ie 0.2% (Encyclopædia Britannica Euphronios). It's only a hundred years, and the most authoritative study of American sexologist Kinsey, Masters and Johnson's record is completely different, higher, number: 2 to 4 percent. It seems to be too little.
However, according to the same Kinsey for 1953 in the USA 37% of white American men had at least one orgasm with a man. Thirty-seven percent of the more than one-third!
It is clear that we have two types of behavior. Perhaps 2-4% of 37% - genetic homosexuals. Who, then, the remaining 33-35%? Where did they come from?
And how to name those involved in homosexual without being genetically predisposed to it?
And here is the clearest, also a recent example: the history of the legalization of gay marriage in New York. June 25, 2011 the State Senate passed a law legalizing same-sex marriage. And now, just two years later, a quarter of marriages in New York City accounted for same-sex couples!
Is it not clear that this is all - gomopropagandy product, the product of purposeful conscious corruption, corruption?
We assume that the judge and punish homosexuals from birth unfair, but how to justify the other?
Can these two categories qualify for the same attitude towards them?
Meanwhile gomopropaganda in the world is downright rabid.
For example, gays and lesbians are aggressively imposed on us mythical statistics, falsifying problem. They claim now that people are born into the type of every ten cases (science denies it).
But this is not enough for them!
How to write the Masters and Johnson, "due to the fact that gay organizations are springing up like mushrooms ... in cities such as Washington DC, San Francisco and New York, there are dozens of organizations supporting homosexuality - an organization of physicians, lawyers, teachers, and parents ...
Other organizations give homosexuals all sorts of advice, from a religious council to medical care.
In many college and university campuses, students have organized gay groups to help each other. Newspapers and magazines homosexual persuasion, even religious, publish information about the homosexual subculture in America, as well as private messages to help you find sexual partners. "
In many Western countries even issued a "gay-guides." Active international legal activity is the International Lesbian and Gay Association. Not far behind in their worries about homosexuals and "Amnesty International".
Working without respite, the International Commission on Human Rights for lesbians and gay men. However, in the same England in 1990 when Margaret Thatcher was adopted by the so-called Article 28, which prohibits promote homosexuality on stage, in movies, on TV and in the press - a rare example of a legitimate resistance to the onslaught of the buggers.
In general it can be stated that the law and the Old and New World capitulated to the demands of sexual minorities.
Today we have to celebrate baiting is not gay, but rather their opponents. Gradually turning the laws of the enemies into friends, American gays and lesbians in their democracy put, we can see that on its head and church morality and tradition, and the public interest, and common sense.
Behind them have achieved their European counterparts.
However, the area of the law - is not the only arena of struggle: homosexuals are well aware that to achieve a solid victory here can only be reversed in their favor public opinion.
Therefore, the scope of ideology, and especially - the area of literature and the arts, there is a long-time strategic effort to gomopropagandy.
Developed and introduced into the consciousness of many gullible public myths about the charms and safety of homosexuality.
In different countries, under the control of, say, a "gay party" get whole areas of the spiritual life of man. In the United States the strongest homolobby in the literature, even in school lessons, for example, study the play about the problems of homosexuals. In France, the same lobby - in literature, theater and cinema. (I remember ever stopped believing courageous heroes of Jean Marais, having learned that he - the veteran community buggers.) In 1994, the second in prestige after the Prix Goncourt, France's literary prize, "Renaud", was awarded the novelist G. Le Ace for the book " How's your father "to tell about the plight of her son and dad - homosexuals. Then the "News" reported that opens in Paris, the first film festival dedicated to gays and lesbians (the forum, in which about a hundred documentaries and feature films).
In Germany homophilia engulfed the world of art galleries, supervising the development of fine art. Homosexual accent pop culture has long been global in nature. And so on. About newspapers, magazines and TV programs bearing the weight of homosexual ideas, I'm not saying their name is legion.
Many years of focused work on mastering the gay public opinion led to the fact that any action against the spread of gomoideologii immediately and severely disabled, and those who dare to raise their voice to evoke a protective instinct healthy (for now) the majority identification label homophobe. On the ensuing consequences not easy.
As an example, here is the fate of the famous pop singer Donna Summer. In 1983, she publicly announced at the concert that AIDS - God's punishment for homosexuality and refused to include in their new album song dedicated to homosexuals.
During this against her amounted to a conspiracy: as a result of long-term boycott of her career and fate were broken. Eight years later, in 1991, she had to say about his "mistake" to recognize that no one else does not condemn. But too late: the way back was not there.
It is significant both: in all states of America "Union Lesbian and Gay Anti-Defamation" has managed to organize picketing cinemas, where there was the famous movie "Basic Instinct", as depicted bisexual women out there "in the form of discrediting them for no reason."
There are other examples of similar mass actions.
The third myth. Homosexuality is harmless to society.
Is this true?
It is worth considering. Let's take a look at the story: what attitude to homosexuality, long-lived peoples, whose age is not measured by centuries, and many thousands of years?
History can be summarized as: had survived for thousands of years, preserved and strengthened the authenticity of the nation, its national beregshie and sexual monoculture.
Died the same nation, sexually "pluralistic" allows the mixing of blood and sexual outrage.
Take the most familiar to us of. In all the Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) homosexuality or sodomy, sodomy, sodomy - is regarded as a grave sin, forbidden under pain of death.
But even more interesting than the ban - the moral evaluation of this sin. "Do not lie with a male as with a woman - the Bible tells us - is an abomination before the Lord" (Leviticus, XVIII, 22).
Jews are called passive homosexuals fornicators and treated with disgust (Job 36, 14).
Homosexuality was adamant and the Talmud (a lesbian he intended caning).
It is written very clearly and understandable sodomy is an abomination, sodomites - bastards.
There is no way a person who professes Judaism, Christianity or Islam, can not look away, nor to abandon the unequivocal assessment. Otherwise, it can not be called neither Jew nor Christian nor Muslim. Accordingly, it can not consider ourselves a Christian country, where are gay marriages, that is - is going legalized abomination.
According to the most sacred book of the Jews - the Torah - have fallen into the sin of homosexuality was supposed to kill, and not somehow: stoning ("a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they may be put to death" - Leviticus).
Just as lieth with a beast, by the way.
In either the Old Testament or the New, we will not meet the representatives of the gay community.
This does not mean that they could not be in biblical times, but, as they say, fearlessly discarded: the bad grass of the field out!
In Judaism generally very strict sexual morality. Is it because Jews are alive and well for the past three and a half thousand years?
And not only Jews. All the people living long and well - all tightly controlled sphere of sexual morality and marriage, and all, of course, denied homosexuality.
Thus, the Egyptian representation before the court after the death of forty-two deities had to make a Negative Confession - each of them to assure that he had not committed any of the sins, for example, is not tortured animals or did not eat the sacrificial meat. In particular, he had to swear that he was not muzhelozhtsem (125 head of "Book of the Dead", the period of the XVIII dynasty).
If he could not give a good answer to the gods of the world beyond the grave, it was not waiting there anything good.
In sredneassiriyskih laws (the third quarter of the II millennium BC. E.) Says (§ 20): "If a man knew his equal, and his oath and the accused was caught, should know him and castrate."
Hindus sodomy entailed the most terrible of punishments - disgraceful expulsion from caste, according to the laws of Manu.
In China, where traditional filolosofiya all built on the idea of harmonious combination of male and female principles ("Yan" and Yin "), during the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911) to the Criminal Code were introduced laws against sodomy, and in Maoist China, it was seen as sexual misconduct and illegal.
It is easy to see that the Egyptians, the Indo-Aryans, the Chinese, the Jews - all ethnic groups of long-lived, champions, who managed to keep themselves longer than others. There's a lot to think about.
On the contrary, people who practiced homosexuality, lived not long, only a thousand years and a half, as the Greeks or the Romans, and their end was sad.
However, Roman law in early appointed a monetary penalty for sodomy, then under the influence of the Greek tradition of homosexuality is widespread, but since the time of the Christian emperors of them it is a harsh punishment - burned and headless.
By the way, the code of the Holy Roman Empire "Carolina", named in honor of Emperor Charles V (XVI century), also kept saying gays to be burned at the stake.
Then, Europe still knew what was what.
It is impossible to mention the homosexuals, not to mention the dangers of AIDS. Among infetsirovannyh buggers are powerful part. In Switzerland, for example, the part - 35%. This risk was due to the Decree of the Minister of Health of Russia 2001 "On approval of the medical examination of donor blood and its components," actually reproduces the wording of the previous similar document "Instructions for the medical examination of donors of blood, plasma, red blood cells," 1998 In accordance with the order , persons "belonging to risk groups (homosexuals, drug addicts, prostitutes)," can not be a blood donor, and (or) its components.
Of course, these measures are necessary and useful, but obviously not enough.
The fourth myth. Homosexuality is harmless to morality.
Moral of the world rests on a religious basis. All the major religions of the world, as we have seen, a negative attitude toward homosexuality. In addition to Satanism, naturally. But it's not just the fact that homosexuals violate religious taboos. As acknowledged by the buggers, sadomasochism has always been an important and prominent part of the gay culture.
It is no accident in the works of the Marquis de Sade homosexuality - attribute masters perversity, their indispensable property.
Anal sex at the Marquis - ruthless, facing both genders, is a tool of oppression, punishment, torture, etc., it is - a clear manifestation of aggression.
Not surprisingly, sodomy - a frequent occurrence where the particular importance are the relations of domination and subordination: the army, in prison, in a monkey nursery.
It is no coincidence as sodomy is often manifested in acts of rape. So those who voted for the one-handed freedom of homosexual, and another - for the fight against pedophilia and sadism, coming in, to say the least, disingenuous.
Meanwhile, homosexuals often tend to a false sense of superiority. "I would advise homosexuals feel aristocrats feel people elected, cream of society" - advises actor Roman Viktyuk.
Generated by an inferiority complex thought about some homosexuals superiority over us like a red thread through shows through their statements and speeches.
How exactly Masters and Johnson noted: "Many homosexuals tend to finally" come out of the closet "to publicly demonstrate pride in their sexual orientation."
Naturally, our world, the world of the healthy majority, they are not satisfied, of course, they would like to change, to create a new world to your taste, in his own image and likeness. And often speak about it directly.
"Our society - heterosexual. A child is brought up from childhood heterosexual, he imposed heterosexual ideas ... The imposition of these stereotypes - monstrous "- do not hesitate to write a gay newspaper" Subject "in an editorial.
Absolutely right sociologist A. GAFAROV: "All experts agree that the homosexuals are dangerous because they impose their way of life, have a wealth of experience abuse, are well aware of the psychological tricks, feel free to use his official position."
In countries which experience we cite as an example, this occurs, for example, as follows.
In the newspaper "Chicago Tribune" published a major report on the activities of the national organization of homosexuals involved in the recruitment of boys for prostitution across the country.
In Los Angeles there is a society Rene Gunona acting under the slogan: "Sex begins with 8 years, before it is too late." The purpose of this organization - to legalize sexual relations between adults and children.
The North American "Association of love to the boys' acting in support of the rights of adults to have sex with teenagers, recently accused the FBI of" witch-hunt "in view of the fact that two of its members were arrested for taking part in the kidnapping of children.
And in France, the home of courtly poetry of Alexander Dumas and Maupassant, lost annually from the families of about seven thousand boys.
The fate of many of them who have fallen into the clutches of traffickers secret "live goods", is very sad and hopeless: they are taught to drugs and forcibly converted to toys rich buggers.
Such is the experience. "Advanced."
In connection with the mentioned need to understand is dangerous not only direct propaganda of homosexuality is dangerous to any mention of it in a positive or neutral tone.
Any such action is working on the destruction of age-old taboos in the public mind, so - psychological defense against cancer cells homosexuality.
Academically objective approach is not appropriate.
And humanism - no argument when it comes not only against the interests and the protection of life and health of the human race.
According to the Penal Code Tsarist Russia for sodomy relied link to Siberia (Article 995), the Christians, moreover, were the church repent.
It was about the same as the active and passive participant, and if the act was accompanied by violence, the perpetrator appointed galleys from 10 to 12 years (Art. 996).
The very same sodomy was defined as "unnatural vice."
In the USSR, after a long period of uncertainty in 1934, a law was passed prohibiting homosexual relationships.
The last version of the law was in 1960, homosexuality (sodomy) was considered as a criminal offense.
There is evidence that from 1934 to 1980 the average annual condemned 1,000 gay men, women, studying psychiatry.
Russian gay person is not a friend, in the new Criminal Code of the Russian Federation sodomy and lesbianism are not considered as separate criminal offenses.
But as Russia was and remains the country morally do not accept homosexuality.
In particular, according to some surveys, up to 85% of the population of Russia against same-sex marriages. Not only Christians condemn homosexuality. In 2006, the Grand Mufti of the Central Spiritual Board of Muslims of Russia Talgat Tajuddin told the news agency "Interfax": "The representatives of sexual minorities can practice what they want, only at home or somewhere tucked away in the dark. If they do go out on the street, then they should just peel. All normal people will do it. "
According to him, "gay men have no rights." "They have transgressed the line - added Mr. Tajuddin. - Have homosexuality - is a crime against God.
Prophet Muhammad ordered the killing of homosexuals. " He quoted the hadith of the Prophet Muhammad, which are in addition to the Koran, establishing the foundations of the Muslim religion - Islam.
Representatives of the Russian Islamic organizations shared the position of the Interreligious Council of Russia (MCP), who spoke against the propaganda of homosexuality.
"In the MCP are spiritual centers of Russia's traditional religions, including Islam, therefore, adopted the MCP document fully reflects the position of Muslims in Russia, including on other issues relating to moral character of society," - said the deputy chairman of the Council of Muftis of Russia (SMR) Damir Gizatullin .
Given the mood Russian people in 2002, a group of deputies of the State Duma, led by Gennady Raikov, made a package of amendments to the Criminal Code, criminalizing of imprisonment for a term of one to five years for "unnatural sexual satisfaction needs men with a man (sodomy). "
One consolation is one thing. Although the Russian Family Code does not contain an explicit definition of the concept of marriage, but it clearly states: "Family relations are regulated in accordance with the principles of voluntary marital union of a man and a woman" (v. 1). And then, too, is quite explicit: "For a marriage requires a mutual voluntary consent of the men and women who marry, and of marriageable age" (v. 12).
When the news of an impending recognition of same-sex marriage in the United Kingdom and France, the Russian Foreign Ministry chief specialist on human rights Konstantin Dolgov said pointedly: "The British and French parliaments have legalized same-sex marriage. This reduces the possibility of the adoption of Russian children by citizens of these countries ... ".
This is not the first statement of official representatives of the Foreign Ministry about the sensitive issue.
In March 2012, speaking at the UN, the same Dolgov said on behalf of Russia: "Our country is opposed to the legalization of same-sex marriage and the creation of a special legal regime for selected groups, including gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transsexuals.
... We oppose the development of specific documents in the sphere of protection against discrimination against people with different sexual orientation in the framework of international organizations. Their rights are already protected by the general anti-discrimination provisions of the universal international treaties in the human rights field. "
Meanwhile, the international gay community, with support from the highest echelons of the political elite of the West, not the first time we were trying to impose their standards of sexual morality.
In November 2011, the Russian Foreign Ministry was forced to reject as "interference in internal affairs," the response of some of the world on the laws banning so-called "gomopropagandy" already existing in many regions of Russia. It was a stone in the garden of Hillary Clinton, who is very tactless expressed concern about the adoption of these laws.
"We try to protect our society from homosexual propaganda, and it is occasionally very nervous reaction from the European Union. These attempts, I believe, are beyond the scope of universally recognized values ... "- sharply and unequivocally, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
A October 2012, the Russian Foreign Ministry official said in the "Report on the Situation of Human Rights in the United States," which limits the negative remarks against gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender people, operating in the United States, violate human rights.
The situation with same-sex marriage puts a new emphasis in the story of the infamous law "Dima Yakovlev", forcing him to look at a new way. Now in the U.S., about 2 million children are being raised in same-sex pairs. Soon, according to the current tendency, a similar pattern occurs in Europe.
Can we allow our orphans were in such families?
For the Russian people the answer is clear: no. ***
In conclusion - the fact is as significant as it is startling.
It turns out that the model for the Statue of Liberty at the gates of New York City at one time served as the wife of King Isaac Singer sewing machines, bore him a daughter, the famous lesbian Vinnarettu Singer, and did not let myself never to either of his two legitimate husbands. See, that's why the statue of Liberty represents America. American freedom, which spawned the super-lesbian ...
How symbolic!
No comments:
Post a Comment